**Since the last post had 52 comments and I have tough time following all the changes in conversation, I strongly encourage people to go to www.tracktalk.net, make an account, and scroll down to the PA thread and talk about O'Hara v. Henderson or whatever else you would like to talk about on there. You can feel free to comment here still, but a forum would be a better place for these comments in most instances.**
Key Returners: Tony Russell (Jr), Sam Haugh (Jr), Reiny Barchet (Jr), Bobby Rimkis (Sr), Seamus Collins (Jr), AJ Chaborek (Sr)
Key Losses: Charlie Grab, Mike Salach
Notable Track Performances: Russell 4:18/9:31, Chaborek 4:22/9:40, Barceht 4:26/9:28, Stratman (Jr) 4:29/9:47, Rimkis 9:40, Collins 9:44
The Henderson boys bested eventual state champions North Penn by an impressive margin at the District One Championships at Lehigh in 2011, but unfortunately were unable to repeat the magic and came up short at the state meet where the team took 5th. But Henderson rebounded on the track, especially in the spring, where a healthy Reiny Barchet exploded back onto everyone's radar with an impressive 9:28 clocking at the District Championships.
Despite the struggles on the state course, Henderson did post solid marks at hilly courses throughout the season. Out in New Jersey Tony Russell and Charlie Grab (now graduated) helped lead the way to a top finish. The injuries to Charlie Grab and Reiny Barchet hindered this Henderson team and weakened their experience factor at the state meeet where the team led by mostly underclassmen had a disappointing day. Keep in mind before the championship season, Charlie Grab was the leader of this Henderson squad and losing him down the stretch hurt in more ways than just the spots he lost.
The boys from Henderson are very well coached and have consistently produced top level talent over the years and are always competitive for a state and district title. This team kind of reminds me of the Coatesville team that won the national championship a few years back. That Coatesville team had a top 5 of all Juniors in 2005, when they, again, failed to pull out the state title despite being one of the favorites. However, in 2006 when the group were all seniors, they left no doubt who the dominate team was. Now I'm not saying Henderson can't win this year or is going to be national champions or anything like that, but I do think this team's best year will be 2013.
Tony Russell has now consistently been a top level runner in District One. He is without a doubt a contender for a top 10 finish at the AAA state championship meet. He showed off some solid 1600 strength to go along with a killer XC season. Reiny Barchet, in my mind, is the guy to watch this season for Henderson. Even after his injuries and set backs during the crucial XC training period, Barchet had a great spring, headlined by his 9:28. He has had success at the District and State meets before as just a Freshman and has arguably been the clutchest runner on Henderson's squad this year. I'm not sure Chaborek's awesome track season is going to transfer to a killer XC year. I think he could end up kind of like an Achraf Khattabi this year if things go well, but he could also just as easily end up like a Sam Zengel. Don't forget about Collins whose brother was a top contributor for this team when they finished 2nd at states.
Plus the JV depth of Henderson is outstanding. They once again took most of the top spots at a very talented JV race at Districts. Their JV squad also features a lot of freshman who could potential become the next Tony Russell as a breakout sophomore.
There is potential here, crazy potential, but ultimately the critics will always point to the past state meets where Henderson has ran solid, but has not blown anyone away. People may make the argument that O'Hara choked at the state meet as well, but as stated by others, O'Hara had 4 guys who placed very well and their 5th man simply had an off day. Henderson had few bright spots at the state meet in XC and took home no individual medals from states in track or XC. I believe Henderson has a very good shot at winning states. They are well coached and heading in right direction. But the fact of the matter is I project that 4 out of their top 5 guys will be Juniors. In XC especially, Seniors are the main reason for big wins.
But tell that to Conner Quinn.
Here are my projected top 5 by states in order:
Barchet (ET #24), Russell (ET #18), Rimkis, Stratman, Haugh
I also agree that Barchet will definitely make headlines, too soon for me to decide who will be faster, Barchet's 3200 is 3 second faster than Russell's but that was later in the season and Russell's lack of motivation probably made it more difficult after it was postponed to 5 pm the next day. But Barchet's 16:05 as a freshman put's him as the distance man on the team. I see these two beating each other every other race, but with neither being clear cut faster than the other.
ReplyDeletecertainly agree, my bet would be Barchet at states but Russell at Henderson
ReplyDeletewoops russell at districts
DeleteThey have a good shot at winning states this year but next year I think they will be the dominate team and maybe could win nationals!
ReplyDeleteNext year you would have to be terminally ill to bet against this team at the state meet, and a national title in 2013 is definitely something these kids are going to be striving for. Imagine what they'll be like at the individual level, they already have 4 kids who will be seniors in 2013 under 4:30 in their sophomore year, that easily suggests all 4 of them as seniors are going to be sub 4:20 with even a sub 4:10 if Russel continues to improve. and the 3200 meter depth I don't think I even need to talk about
Deleteman, this team has great potential.
ReplyDeleteWhat other teams are you going to showcase? Or are these the only two?
ReplyDeletewell im hoping to start with all the teams on my top 10 rankings from earlier and then put up some sleepers and other teams of interest if everything goes well
ReplyDeleteThe key to Henderson winning states this coming season is how far they can push O'haras 4 and 5 guys back. Make that 5 because I don't see any more than one person jumping infront of their freshman kid. and plus the addition of more runners competing at states will aid in making the O'hara #5 man move to higher scoring places. It isn't just a O'hara vs. Henderson at the state meet, because the other runners not from those teams will affect the places of the runners on them and determine who wins
ReplyDeletei think its insane to say that no more than one person will beat james from this henderson team. With Russel, Barchet, and Haugh (who deserves more talk, he was injured all outdoor season) i would be surprised if they didn't put at least 3 in front of James
ReplyDeleteI meant that no one who isn't already faster wont jump infront of him
Deleteand to make up for what I posted last time here's a little 1 on 1 meet I did on paper, the letter and number to the left is the place on their team, then the number to the right is the place overall.
DeleteO1 Savage 1
H1 Russell 2
H2 Barchet 3
O2 pitone 4
O3 Pastone 5
H3 Haugh 6
Right now the score is O'hara 10, Henderson 11
then onto the 4th and 5th guys it goes
O4 James 7
H4 Collins 8
(H5 rimkis) 9-end of henderson scoring
H6 Chaboreck 10
O5 Smart 11
so, now the final score on a only O'hara vs. Henderson is O'hara 28, Henderson 28... because Henderson's 6th guy is able to bounce smart back a point.(Chaborecks pr is only a 16:30 something but that's only because of a bad race at the only fast course they got to run at that season.)
but on a 1 v 1 meet it is a draw, come states time Henderson will be the team to come out on top because there will be more runners to push Smart's place back even further.
Just making a point that we are basing this on Smart's time last year when he wasn't training with the Ohara guys. Training with competition will move him up on that list. It will just take time to train him.
ReplyDeleteSmart trained with Henderson last summer.
Delete